Thread:GokūBlack10/@comment-3403804-20130619225303/@comment-3403804-20130620034207

Actually, it IS my responsibility, as one of the leaders of this fanon to point out if someone were out of line. Indeed, I DO have the authority to demand an apology, I do have the authority to demand that people reconcile their differences; as do both you and Ten. I likewise also have the authority to reprimand someone for their bad behavior. This is very important because we're currently under a reformation here, and its of absolute imperative that we treat one another with respect, cooperate and strive to create a pleasant environment.

I'm not out of my jurisdiction, that assumes that only certain people have the right to voice their opinion. They don't, you, me and Ten are all Administrators, meaning that we're public figures, we represent the community. And its therefore of vital importance that we police one another as well as the userbase, if I had acted out of line then I would expect any of you to inform me of it, like you've just done. This is because when any of us do something wrong or act impulsively or rashly, we may jeopardize the environment of this fanon and this is often caused without our own knowing.

Ten is a veteran, and one of the oldest Admins, he's also an important public figure. Illusive Dream is a new user who has done well on this wiki and helped make it work during your absence. When it comes to misconduct, Ten should know a lot better, and I expect more from him, you and myself than I expect from any other users, so when there's a question between who is most in the wrong, the choice naturally falls upon the senior user.

Now, in regards to you "no right to speak" statement, let me use this opportunity to point something out that you wrote in your own blog when you were underway to choose NF's leadership.

"Activity: You must be active on NF at least four days a week, but you may not be absent from Wiki affairs for a consistent period longer than three days without letting me know prior of an incident, or if you are an Admin, you will be demoted and replaced. You don't need to tell me why you're going to be absent, but you need to tell me when and for how long you think you'll be gone, so that actions may be taken to ensure that your duties as a Kage will be covered until your return."

You did none of these things. Neither did Ten once he vanished, but I've already discussed that part with Ten, and that's that. When you and Ten vanished however, someone obviously had to assume your positions and do your part. Therefore I made myself your replacement and have for the past few months being doing your work, which is why I've elected so many aides - because I needed someone to help me take some of that load.

You're hardly active on the site at all, you're merely observing it, without being present, this has to change quickly Sei. Me, Python and Ben have been obeying this diligently and setting aside a good amount of time to the betterment of this wiki which easily fills the quota of "four days a week" - by comparison, both you and Ten simultaneously vanished almost at the exact same time. Ten only recently returned and you've only edited here to defend him. Neither you nor Ten are exempt from the guidelines and rules you made; you do not have political immunity.

You have done excellent work as an Admin here, and you can be sure I'm grateful as both a fellow Admin and a user for that, but it does not excuse this kind of behavior

This is flattering, and its also entirely true - we do not excuse this kind of behavior. What Illusive did was a mishap on her part, and I assure you she will be notified, however - she IS my aide, which means she is indeed in charge of content control, and this IS content. I don't think its appropriate to keep them from doing their job based upon that particular rule, because that's basically what they're meant to do and they're expected to be capable of approaching it in a professional fashion. In this case however, Illusive's argument was flawed and you did have a point there, cause it definitely had unprofessional elements.

Not you, nor your ANBU, have any right to force your ideas of what makes a good literary story.

Perfectly true, and we don't, Chrono laid the case to rest after a while because he was merely curious. Void was discussing how what was happening was actually pretty much the same as Kekkei Genkai. Illusive's post was generally meant well but had some unfortunate choice of words, and lastly - I had nothing to do with this at all. I do not direct my ANBU, because I expect them to be both autonomous and self-sufficient; I trust them to raise good questions and make the right calls. So, to insinuate that I'm somehow sending them at Ten is false, we both know that these people are quite self-aware and independent which is good of authority figures.

Finally, its great that you're returning to chat. I think there's a lot of catching up to do here, as well the necessity of establishing a full manual of adminship which can easily be accessed and reviewed as things come along. It'd help immensely, as at the current moment, each of us seem to be operating primarily on a few vague generalized duties which leaves much to be desired. This should be our primary agenda following your return.