User blog comment:Shifūha/Admin Nominations: Public Corner (OPEN)/@comment-2089817-20140912145359/@comment-3030647-20140912223827

Thank you for the question, Sei. I appreciate it.

The way I would like to handle content quality and content control is through two methods, since they are clearly two different aspects. I'll bullet point them to make it a bit easier to clarify:
 * Content Quality: I would like to handle content quality through the promotion of good content throughout the wiki by my own voice - aka through blog posts and additional methods. I believe that the maintenance of the content quality of the site may only be done through example, among other things. Hence, I will strive to the best of my ability to improve my own articles in a wide variety of manners in order to expose the necessity of content quality. While I would like to do this to the point where the user themselves realize the intrinsic value of maintaining a high standard of quality among their articles, I understand that doing so will take me a very long time. If possible, a reward system of some sort might be put in place, either that or a competitive atmosphere to which people might spark their creativity towards a concept I've given to them as an "optional challenge" in order to demonstrate their own literary prowess, perhaps.
 * Content Control: With content control, there is only so much I can do without appearing restricting to the userbase at large. I do not plan to entirely remove the possibilities that people can adhere to (amassing powers similar to those recently displayed in canon, etc) because I know that people can show off their creativity through these methods. However, I will watch out for those articles that really do break the boundaries of canon without giving any story in regards to the acquisition of those abilities, including those who have plagiarized the use of such abilities. I also, if voted in, would like the other members of the administration - and even the userbase - to approve of this method of isolating specific articles and allowing me to discuss with the user as to why the article does need to meet certain quality standards. On the note of quality standards, I wish to initiate a certain system that people would have to follow for their initial tenure, which would be that, if their article does not meet a certain standard (Manual of Style, powers, etc) that they would be assisted and monitored by either myself or - if the two-month trial successfully finishes with me on top of it - an aide of mine to assist them in the writing process as a whole.

These might not be the best answer to your questions, but I'd like to thank you for putting me on the spot here! Really gives me a good idea about how to go about actually doing something for the community, rather than just saying I will. Thanks!