Thread:TsukikoKoizumi/@comment-30442944-20170714094353/@comment-30442944-20170716003321

http://prntscr.com/fw7016 Then really it should mention that, should it not? Otherwise it    -seriously- looks like a copyright claim. Still doesn't show any changes to the profile though, which does not help. So, thank you for at the very least telling me that, as the only info I got from the rules area is in that screenshot.

Banning for 1) trying to help, as the most I've done is attempt to make sure GokuBlack doesn't get sued by whoever made the original page and explain several fairly legal workarounds to having similar jutsus and the like. There are also some "Don't do this, this can still be considered against copyright." and 2) not understanding something, which is cause for concern that your go-to to seeing someone who doesn't understand something not written out on the site is banning them instead of helping them understand, like explaining it is explaining that specific version, despite being a complete copy of the original, is only for a specific story, is not good. Calling out what looks like copyright claims that are false, giving advise on how to share pages, mostly jutsu, that might appear similar without directly copying the source, and offering to fix said copyright issue in the most calm and respectable way I can as harassment is hardly fair, as my intentions when making this page was to aid others. Was my part about copyrighting exact copies of a Naruto wiki page as your own a bit harsh? Perhaps, but something like that needs to be said somewhat harshly so people understand it can become a big deal if circumstances turn ugly. Being fined a lot of money because of a misunderstanding is not fun. I hope you consider changing the banner to mention it is a different universe's version, and not simply "I made this page so nobody else can use it", but doing so is up to you guys. Until we meet again, arrivederci!