Thread:Berserkchart486/@comment-25152698-20160122201512/@comment-25152698-20160125151119

Alright, and for the record, this is exactly what I meant, lol. You changed your post what, like three to four times now? Even after giving me the nod that you were all good?

I'm not calling you out on it, but I want you to understand what I meant earlier, when I said "meta-gaming", because there are different interpretations of it. This is the definition which I abide to:

Metagaming is any strategy, action or method used in a game which transcends a prescribed ruleset, uses external factors to affect the game, or goes beyond the supposed limits or environment set by the game.

What I meant by what I said was that I didn't intend on playing mind games with you, as in I didn't want what I personally said to have any effect on the decisions and manner in which 'your character behaved, which now it has, evidently. So in that regard, this would correlate to the external factors portion of the definition. Get what I mean?

Now, I'm not accusing you of cheating, (so I don't need passers-by to come in and scold me) but I did still want to defend my statement, as to why it is that I don't "answer someone when they ask you a question" (it depends on the question; I will answer for the sake of clarifications, though never for the sake of revelations).

Anyway, I'm not going to ask you to change your post, since I already posted, but yeah, don't overestimate me, lol. You're throwing yourself under the bus by expecting more from me like that when I'm really keeping it simple. And don't let my words on this thread be a factor in your posts. I'm not trying to be a cunning bastard. Because I already am a cunning bastard. But yeah, if you need any clarifications at all, such as how I did something or even when I did something, then I'll explain it to you afterwards (so, like, now).