Thread:GokūBlack10/@comment-3403804-20130619225303/@comment-3454557-20130620013531

Whoa whoa. Isn't this going too far? It was just a side-discussion on a page. I don't think anything he said was any more condescending than how I act ordinarily. I don't think anything about the page in question violates a strict interpretation of the rules. I DO think it has flimsy logic, but that's not grounds for denying a page, and in fact, I don't believe we even have the authority to deny a page if it isn't in violation with policy. Frankly, I'm just as fed up with the discussion as Ten is. I just wanted to know what his justifications/logic were, and people started dogpiling the talk page. I don't think he's made any special exceptions for his page. I think Illusive has a point about a lack of creativity in it; not more than a week after the Ino-Shika-Cho combo is introduced, it's already been copied to another character. More than that, infinite chakra? The artificial human is basically just a cheat code. It's just an excuse to get more power. It undermines every other character, it steals their "thunder", by enabling a copy that steals every aspect of them- even techniques that cannot be copied, like Hiden and Hijutsu. But even if the criticisms are valid, regardless of the article content, I think he doesn't have a responsibility to respond to any criticisms. I don't believe you can demand he respond at all. Free speech and all that. Whether or not his manner is appropriate as an admin, I cannot be the judge. I've been outright nasty to people in the past, condescending, and flippant. I think it bears repeating that my behavior is not consistent with a personable and respectful person, and this was my biggest reservation about being an admin in the first place.