Board Thread:Fanon Canon Policies/@comment-4869113-20140921223159/@comment-24602092-20140921224555

The many times I talked about this prior, N and I had discussed what would be the best possible situation for an ending off which the Fanon Canon could be bounced on. Granted it was one of many conversations, and not one I shared with the group, it was my interpretation of how the 'ending' of canon would have been laid out, and where the beginning of the Fanon Canon could begin.

That being the death of Obito and Madara. (Kaguya was before the discussion, but was theorized that her or Hagoromo would be the main villain, glad to see we weren't wrong). Obito and Madara's death would be in the same chapter, not leaving any individual interpretation of their demise up to the wind, and not allowing the fan base to scheme and toil with their power cravings to obtain their body parts or so on and on.

In the same chapter, Kaguya would not be revealed. Leaving us an open ending, and an open beginning, with the fall of Madara as the true villain, Kaguya was merely an integral playing piece of the grand scheme of things, but not a ploy to create an interesting 'twist' through her resurrection.

This allows us to then interpret a short period of time after the finale as an open ending for us to potentially utilize to create interesting backgrounds, personalities, and devise the future for the canon characters that were there of apart of the open ending, without placing constrained labels of "SASUKE TRAINED MY CHARACTER, NARUTO TRAINED MY CHARACTER, HE CANT TRAIN YOURS AFTER THE WAR" etc etc etc.

This is merely my interpretation. TL;DR: Madara and Obito die, Kaguya stays apart of the history, but no real part in the story line. Fanon Canon begins around a month or more after to begin for us to utilize, leaving an open 'ending' to the users.