User blog comment:ArtistOfTheDaleks/Before I Leave, I have a few questions./@comment-26116199-20200202075153/@comment-26116199-20200204084534

Even if I ignore the numerous script errors on your page, your formatting was wild; putting it mildly. You literally did not give a toss about your sections and subsections — you'd have one section for abilities and a separate section for Kekkei Genkai, instead of having a subsection for KG (this is merely an example, don't get me started on how you had entire sections for individual techniques). Don't try to lie your way out by claiming your articles were properly formatted, I've seen all of them, I'll call you out on this kind of bluff any time.

Bullshit? Really?

As I mentioned way back in my reply to your rather aggressive blog rant, who are you to say that? You don't edit on this wiki anymore and only pop up when you discover that your articles, which have violated the MoS for years, were justly deleted. You haveno right to claim that the ends do not justify the means because you haven't been even present to see the improvements. It's very easy to argue and act like you're in the right when you make up facts and expect people to treat those as gospel truth.

Time and again you act as if the whole wiki is in revolt and that they've appointed you, Artist, as the rightful revolutionary. Snap out of it man, it's getting tiresome — you're the only one who's dissatisfied, stop dragging people into this. You chose to leave the community two or three years back and you're again claiming you want to move on and most importantly, don't act like people are cowards that won't speak out unless you do. If enough people speak out about the rules they're dissatisfied with, the staff will comply. If it's just you—an inactive user who keeps quitting...who's angry that his violations have been deleted...with a history of threatening, cursing and fighting users—who is disgruntled, I'd hardly say it's much cause for concern.

Don't bring manliness into all of this. If we want to bring toxic masculine concepts and notions into the picture, tell me how you creating fifty blogs whining about the site and hurling obscenities is manly? The primary directive for any staff member is to prioritise the wellbeing of the wiki; your articles were sequestered here because you used NF as a bank, never intending to participate here. To add insult to injury you spammed those character infoboxes with hundreds of jutsu, without sufficient elaboration; you also (as previously mentioned) had a knack for throwing formatting out a tower window, so there's that. The staff will not let whatever you do simply slide because sorry to say, we care about the wiki and the most basic standards. Professionalism is important and we will guard that tightly, not up for debate.

On an individual level, I couldn't care less what you decide to make Art; and I've never deleted any of your articles. But as a member (or former member, or inactive member or anything you choose to identify with), if you were serious about being a part of this community you should have held yourself to its standards. You keep expecting us to bend backwards to accommodate you, it doesn't work that way. Like I said, your techniques and whatnot and their restoration is between you and whichever admin; I couldn't care less how that goes.

Don't go around saying "no one speaks up because it's useless" or that we wouldn't listen. Frankly me going out this far and actually responding to you proves otherwise. If you want to discuss I'm all for it, but if that discussion is going to lead with made up facts and fantasy notions of revolution, I'd say just stop and leave the site, because that's what people do when they can't get along with the administration.

If you want to have your opinions heard, stop insinuating that we're a dictatorship silencing dissenting opinions. Go around and ask any user here about my involvement with them, about how I make sure everyone is heard one way or another; whether we argue or disagree every opinion is heard. I'd dare put my own reputation on the line with this statement.

Hell if you're honest to yourself, you'll even remember that our roles were actually reversed in 2016: when you created a blog demanding that we delete older, inactive users articles and where I argued against you on that, in order to leave a legacy behind. Making matters worse, you wanted ALL inactive users to get their articles booted. Somehow that stings when you're at the end, doesn't it? But you should know how important legacies are to me, and even I (who would be usually against the deletion of older articles) am in agreement to the deletion of most of your articles. It's much easier to delete offenders if there are no Kintaros for them to point at and ask "How come this gets to stay on when my guy gets deleted?". I've seen the fruits of what the admins decided on, thus again I say, the ends justify the means. Logically speaking, it seemed like an efficient option and now in hindsight, it's saved us a lot of time dealing with troublemakers as well.

Oh and by the way. About you mentioning Neji's articles, don't worry. They'll be observed as well and if we find sufficient reasons for deletion, we'll terminate those as well. There's no more preferential treatment now as that which you and the likes of ChidoriSpark enjoyed up to 2019, if the bare basics are inadequate, there's no reason to keep certain articles. Simple.